Implications of intra-family and external ownership transfer of family firms: short-term and long-term performance differences

The Institute's reading

Two different things are being measured, and conflating them is how owners talk themselves into the wrong decision. Performance and survival are not the same objective. A business handed to the next generation is more likely to still exist; a business sold to an outsider is more likely to do well. The authors attribute the difference to the long-term orientation families carry into the next generation, and to the willingness of an outside acquirer to bear uncertainty in the expectation of improving something.

The uncomfortable implication is that the family pool of managerial talent is small by construction. You are choosing a successor from a group of perhaps three people who happen to be related to you, against a buyer who was selected from a market. That is not a judgment about any particular child; it is arithmetic, and it deserves to be said out loud before a succession is decided by default.

The paper is also candid about why buying a family firm is hard, which cuts the other way for readers on the buy side. Much of what makes such a business work is tacit and sits with the family, so formal diligence will not surface it. The authors treat acquirers of closely held family firms as bearers of genuine uncertainty, entrepreneurial in the same sense as founders.

Key propositions

• Family firms transferred to external owners outperform those transferred within the family.
• Survival rates are higher among intra-family transfers than external ones.
• In the sample, roughly 35 percent of ownership transitions occurred within the family and 65 percent went to outsiders.
• Information asymmetry is acute in family firm sales because much of the firm’s knowledge is tacit and held by the owning family.

In practice

• Decide first which you are optimizing for, the survival of the business as a family institution or its performance as an enterprise. They point to different buyers.
• If you are selling a family business, assume the buyer discounts for what they cannot verify, and plan deliberately for how tacit knowledge transfers.

Where authorities disagree

This is Swedish data, and succession norms, tax treatment and family structures differ by country, so treat the direction of the finding as more portable than its magnitude. It also sits in tension with the seller-side literature elsewhere on this shelf that treats a sale as the natural completion of the entrepreneurial process: here, the intra-family route buys something real, just not performance.

Related entries