Across more than twenty years of global data, McKinsey’s series finds the same ordering: companies running deliberate acquisition programs, many smaller deals, each tied to a stated theme and capability, deliver better shareholder returns than peers betting on occasional large transformations, and with tighter downside. The prescription is thematic discipline: an explicit M&A blueprint tied to strategy, a maintained pipeline, and repeatable integration.
The Institute’s reading: read this alongside Laamanen and Keil, because the two together give the honest sentence: a program of themed, digestible deals beats bold strokes, and a program run too fast or erratically beats nothing at all out of you. For a private company the translation is a written theme, a standing pipeline of five to ten named candidates, and a pace gated by integration capacity rather than by deal flow.