home  /  library  /  kaplan-weisbach-success-of-acquisitions
Articles & papers

The Success of Acquisitions: Evidence from Divestitures

Steven N. Kaplan and Michael S. Weisbach · The Journal of Finance, 1992 · The Journal of Finance, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 107-138

Strategy & readinessIntegrationBuyers who assume selling later means failing
Why it is on the shelf. The paper that complicated the favorite statistic of acquisition pessimists: a large share of acquisitions are eventually divested, but the divestiture itself is often not evidence the deal failed. What matters is why you exit and at what value.

The Institute's reading

Kaplan and Weisbach tracked large acquisitions over decades and found that nearly half were later divested, yet on their accounting of outcomes only a minority of those divestitures looked like failures; many were profitable exits or sensible portfolio changes. The paper forces precision on a lazy debate: holding forever is not the definition of success, and selling is not the definition of failure.

The Institute’s reading: for private buyers this cuts both ways. It licenses honest exits, an acquisition that no longer fits can be sold without shame, and it sharpens the thesis discipline: if you can already imagine the divestiture, write down what would trigger it and what the asset must be worth to someone else. The best buyers underwrite the exit as carefully as the entry.

Key propositions

  • Divestiture rates overstate failure rates; exits are outcomes to be classified, not verdicts.
  • Success is defined by value created over the holding period, not by permanence.

In practice

  • Write the conditions under which you would sell the acquired company into the thesis itself.
Acquisition Conciergeorientation · not legal, tax or valuation advice
Happy to dig into it. What would you like to pressure-test from The Success of Acquisitions: Evidence from Divestitures: one of its propositions, how it applies to your situation, or where it disagrees with the rest of the shelf?